Detailed Information

Cited 11 time in webofscience Cited 9 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Amplified Gastroesophageal Cancer: Retrospective Global Experience

Authors
Maron, SB[Maron, Steven B.]Moya, S[Moya, Stephanie]Morano, F[Morano, Federica]Emmett, MJ[Emmett, Matthew J.]Chou, JF[Chou, Joanne F.]Sabwa, S[Sabwa, Shalom]Walch, H[Walch, Henry]Peterson, B[Peterson, Bryan]Schrock, AB[Schrock, Alexa B.]Zhang, LL[Zhang, Liangliang]Janjigian, YY[Janjigian, Yelena Y.]Chalasani, S[Chalasani, Sree]Ku, GY[Ku, Geoffrey Y.]Disel, U[Disel, Umut]Enzinger, P[Enzinger, Peter]Uboha, N[Uboha, Nataliya]Kato, S[Kato, Shumei]Yoshino, T[Yoshino, Takayuki]Shitara, K[Shitara, Kohei]Nakamura, Y[Nakamura, Yoshiaki]Saeed, A[Saeed, Anwaar]Kasi, PM[Kasi, Pashtoon M.]Chao, J[Chao, Joseph]Lee, J[Lee, Jeeyun]Capanu, M[Capanu, Marinela]Wainberg, Z[Wainberg, Zev]Petty, R[Petty, Russell]Pietrantonio, F[Pietrantonio, Filippo]Klempner, SJ[Klempner, Samuel J.]Catenacci, DVT[Catenacci, Daniel V. T.]
Issue Date
1-Aug-2022
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, v.40, no.22, pp.2458 - +
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume
40
Number
22
Start Page
2458
End Page
+
URI
https://scholarx.skku.edu/handle/2021.sw.skku/100135
DOI
10.1200/JCO.21.02453
ISSN
0732-183X
Abstract
PURPOSE Subset analyses from phase III evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition (EGFRi) suggest improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), but large-scale analyses are lacking. This multi-institutional analysis sought to determine the role of EGFRi in the largest cohort of patients with EGFR-amplified GEA to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 60 patients from 15 tertiary cancer centers in six countries met the inclusion criteria. These criteria required histologically confirmed GEA in the metastatic or unresectable setting with EGFR amplification identified by using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved assay, and who received on- or off-protocol EGFRi. Testing could be by tissue next-generation sequencing, plasma circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing, and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization performed by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments approved laboratory. Treatment patterns and outcomes analysis was also performed using a deidentified clinicogenomic database (CGDB). RESULTS Sixty patients with EGFR-amplified GEA received EGFRi, including 31 of 60 patients (52%) with concurrent chemotherapy. Across treatment lines, patients achieved a 43% objective response rate with a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.4). Patients receiving EGFRi in first-, second-, and third-line therapy achieved a median overall survival of 20.6 months (95% CI, 13.5 to not reached [NR]), 9 months (95% CI, 7.9 to NR), and 8.4 months (7.6 to NR), respectively. This survival far exceeded the 11.2-month (95% CI, 8.7 to 14.2) median overall survival from first-line initiation of non-EGFRi therapy in patients with EGFR-amplified GEA in the CGDB. Despite this benefit, analysis of the CGDB (January 2011-December 2020) suggests that only 5% of patients with EGFR-amplified GEA received EGFRi. CONCLUSION Patients with EGFR-amplified GEA derive significant benefit from EGFRi. Further prospective investigation of EGFRi in a well-selected patient population is ongoing in an upcoming trial of amivantamab in EGFR and/or MET amplified GEA.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher LEE, JEE YUN photo

LEE, JEE YUN
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE