Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Improving flood-prone areas mapping using geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI): A non-parametric algorithm enhanced by math-based metaheuristic algorithms

Authors
Razavi-Termeh, Seyed VahidSadeghi-Niaraki, AbolghasemAli, FarmanChoi, Soo-Mi
Issue Date
Feb-2025
Publisher
Academic Press
Keywords
Flood-prone areas; Geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI); Machine learning; Metahurestic algorithms; Satellite imagery
Citation
Journal of Environmental Management, v.375
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Environmental Management
Volume
375
URI
https://scholarx.skku.edu/handle/2021.sw.skku/120194
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124238
ISSN
0301-4797
1095-8630
Abstract
Flooding presents substantial dangers to human lives and infrastructure, underscoring the need to map flood-prone areas to implement effective mitigation measures precisely. Although machine learning algorithms have made great strides, their accuracy in flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) remains limited due to data dependence, interpretability, and explainability issues, overfitting, generalization difficulties, and hyperparameter tuning. This study suggests combining the Decision Tree (DT) algorithm with advanced, math-based metaheuristic optimization algorithms to address these limitations. In this study, the FSM was prepared using a combination of the DT non-parametric algorithm and three math-based metaheuristic optimization algorithms, including the gradient-based optimizer (GBO), chaos game optimization (CGO), and arithmetic optimization algorithm (AOA). Four models were developed and compared for modeling and mapping: the basic DT, DT-AOA, DT-GBO, and DT-CGO. The DT-CGO model stood out on the training set, achieving the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.17. It was closely followed by DT-AOA (0.19), DT-GBO (0.2), and DT (0.201). In terms of mean absolute error (MAE), the DT-CGO model exhibited the lowest value of 0.06, followed by DT-AOA (0.07), DT-GBO (0.079), and the basic DT model (0.08). When considering the coefficient of determination (R2), the DT-CGO model achieved the highest value of 0.871, followed by DT-AOA (0.853), DT-GBO (0.84), and DT (0.838). The enhanced models performed superior over the test set's basic DT model. The area under the curve (AUC) values validated the enhanced models' efficacy, with the DT-CGO model achieving the highest AUC of 0.978, followed by DT-AOA (0.974), DT-GBO (0.967), and DT (0.958). The findings emphasize the importance of accurate flood-prone area identification and provide valuable insights for policymakers to develop robust flood mitigation strategies. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Computing and Informatics > Convergence > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher ALI, FARMAN photo

ALI, FARMAN
Computing and Informatics (Convergence)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE