@

초록

This study, through a literature review, identified a connection between regional identity, as studied in the field of geography, and university identity, as explored in higher education, both of which can be linked through structuration theory. However, a conceptual gap regarding "region" exists between these two fields. This study focuses on that gap and investigates the research question: "Do universities possess a regional identity? If so, how is it formed?" This study uses universities' specialization plans to examine whether universities' identities differ by region. It also investigates whether their roles vary depending on regional context, and, if so, how these differences emerge. The findings reveal evidence that universities within the same region share similar cognitive characteristics and adjust their roles according to the institutionalization process that emerges within regional narratives and social practices. These regional narratives and practices reflect resource imbalances among regions and the concept of the duality of structure. Based on these findings, this study argues that universities do indeed have a regional identity, which is formed through institutionalization. This institutionalization process involves hidden spatial tensions and imbalances of power among regions. As a result, this study presents a framework for understanding university regional identity, applicable not only to South Korea-where regional resource imbalances and university stratification are evident-but also to other countries facing similar challenges.

키워드