Human or Not?: An Experiment With Chatbot Manipulations to Test Machine Heuristics and Political Self-Concepts

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

1
Citations

SCOPUS

1

초록

Chatbots have a growing role to play in political discourse, including in political campaigns, voter mobilization ventures, and dissemination of political news, though chatbots in the political domain are relatively understudied. While testing the machine heuristics and political self-concepts frameworks, we carried out a 2 x 2 experiment where both perceived conversational partner (i.e., bot, human) and topic (i.e., political, casual) were manipulated (N = 126). During the experiment, participants exchanged chat messages with trained research confederates for 30 min. In support of the machine heuristics and political self-concepts frameworks, participants assigned to human partners reported more positive relationships and higher political interest. Through moderation analysis, liking the partner was found to differ between the perceived partner conditions, with perceived political knowledge varying more in the human conditions. Thus, the experimental findings add nuance to interpersonal (i.e., impression management and social identity theory) and human-computer interaction theories (i.e., machine heuristics and Computers Are Social Actors), and have broader implications for online political interactions and for decisionmakers of online political discourse spaces.

키워드

chatbotsmachine heuristicspolitical discoursepolitical self-conceptsrelationship perceptionsSOCIAL RESPONSESCOMMUNICATIONCONVERSATIONSIDENTITYMEDIA
제목
Human or Not?: An Experiment With Chatbot Manipulations to Test Machine Heuristics and Political Self-Concepts
저자
Huang-Isherwood, Ke M.Cho, JaehoHong, Joo-WhaLee, Eugene
DOI
10.1177/08944393241252027
발행일
2024-05
유형
Article; Early Access
저널명
Social Science Computer Review
43
2
페이지
425 ~ 445